Mountains classification in the Tour de France
Below is an old version of an explanation of the mountains classification in the Tour de France. For a more complete story, that I tried to keep up to date, see my book about Tour de France statistics and rules.
Also see the overview of mountain passes in the Tour de France.
Origin
Some sources say that from 1905 on, l'Auto declared one rider to be the Meilleur Grimpeur. I have not found any any reference to that in the l'Auto archives, so until I find evidence of that, I consider that a myth. I suspect that somewhere in the 1940s or 1950s, l'Équipe made an overview of who had been the best climber in each Tour, and later on somebody misinterpreted this list.
1908: Prix Labor-Hutchinson
In 1908, there was a prize sponsored by Labor-Hutchinson, which was won by earning points on mountain tops. Not every mountain gave the same number of points, but it was always the top three at a mountain pass that received points. Four mountains were used, and the ranking at the end was:
| source (Passerieu is not in the source, but he is in the stage report) | |||||
| Rider | Ballon | Porte | Laffrey | Esterel | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucien Petit-Breton | 6 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 20 |
| Gustave Garrigou | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 13 |
| François Faber | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 12 |
| André Pierre Pottier | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Giovanni Gerbi | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| Georges Passerieu | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
The points distribution had been determined before the Tour started, so it did not depend on the margin to other riders. (source)
In the next years, more and higher mountains were included in the courses. At the highest points, prize money was available for the first rider(s), but no classification was made between 1909 and 1932.
Points system
Points system in 1933–1939
In 1933, a classification was used. This was a success, and it was repeated in the Tour of 1934. The winner received 10000 francs.(source).
In the Tours from 1933 to 1939, the organisation selected around 15 mountains, where points could be earned according to this simple system:
| Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Mountains were not yet divided into separate categories. To win this mountain classification, a rider had to finish the last mountain stage, but did not need to finish the Tour. (source) This happened in 1937, when Felicien Vervaecke had won the mountains classification after the 15th stage, but did not start the 17th stage.
Points system in 1947 and 1948
In 1947, there were two categories for mountains. The highest mountains were in category A, the lower in category B. The Tour of 1948 also used two categories, but from now on they were named category 1 (toughest) and category 2 (easiest).
| Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category A/1 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Category B/2 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Points system in 1949–1961
In 1949, the third category was added, and the points for the second category slightly increased.
| Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category 1 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Category 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Category 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Points system in 1962
A fourth category was added in 1962. More points were earned on the other categories, and the points system was no longer linear.
| Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category 1 | 15 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Category 2 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||
| Category 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| Category 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Points system in 1963
The points system in 1963 was identical to the one in 1962, only the fourth category was not used.
| Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category 1 | 15 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Category 2 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||
| Category 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Points system in 1964–1970
In 1964, the fourth category returned, and the system was identical to that of 1962.
| Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category 1 | 15 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Category 2 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||
| Category 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| Category 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
In 1966, a rider had to finish the Tour to be eligible for the mountain classification. (source)
Points system in 1971
The points system changed in 1971, when the second, third and fourth categories were given more points.
| Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category 1 | 15 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Category 2 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | ||
| Category 3 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | ||||
| Category 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Points system in 2005–2006
The point system in 2005 and 2006 was as follows: (Rules 2005, article 25c, Rules 2006, article 24c)
| Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC | 20 | 18 | 16 | 14 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Category 1 | 15 | 13 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | ||
| Category 2 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | ||||
| Category 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||||||
| Category 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
When a stage ended on a pass of category HC, 1 or 2, points were doubled. To win the mountains classification, a rider had to finish the Tour. In case riders were tied on points, the rider who reach the most HC category climbs was ranked higher. If that was equal, the most category 1 climbs, then 2, 3 and 4. If all this was tied, the position in the general classification would have been decisive.
Distribution in categories per year
| Year | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | HC | Maximum available points | Points winner | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1933 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 160 | 134 | 83% |
| 1934 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 140 | 111 | 79% |
| 1935 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 150 | 118 | 78% |
| 1936 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 160 | 132 | 82% |
| 1937 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 160 | 114 | 71% |
| 1938 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 120 | 107 | 89% |
| 1939 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 100 | 86 | 86% |
| 1947 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 135 | 98 | 72% |
| 1948 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 95 | 62 | 65% |
| 1949 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 101 | 81 | 80% |
| 1950 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 89 | 58 | 65% |
| 1951 | 0 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 129 | 60 | 46% |
| 1952 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 133 | 92 | 69% |
| 1953 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 121 | 54 | 44% |
| 1954 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 130 | 95 | 73% |
| 1955 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 132 | 84 | 63% |
| 1956 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 120 | 71 | 59% |
| 1957 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 110 | 44 | 40% |
| 1958 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 124 | 81 | 65% |
| 1959 | 0 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 135 | 73 | 54% |
| 1960 | 0 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 129 | 56 | 43% |
| 1961 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 138 | 95 | 68% |
| 1962 | 18 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 209 | 137 | 65% |
| 1963 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 195 | 147 | 75% |
| 1964 | 13 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 249 | 173 | 69% |
| 1965 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 243 | 133 | 54% |
| 1966 | 13 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 239 | 123 | 51% |
| 1967 | 13 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 239 | 122 | 51% |
| 1968 | 20 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 240 | 96 | 40% |
| 1969 | 16 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 293 | 155 | 52% |
| 1970 | 30 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 350 | 128 | 36% |
| 1971 | 24 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 411 | 228 | 55% |
| 1972 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 446 | 229 | 51% |
| 1973 | 22 | 9 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 452 | 225 | 49% |
| 1974 | 23 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 379 | 171 | 45% |
| 1975 | 17 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 400 | 285 | 71% |
| 1976 | 22 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 415 | 170 | 40% |
| 1977 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 380 | 244 | 64% |
| 1978 | 26 | 15 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 448 | 187 | 41% |
| 1979 | 27 | 12 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 502 | 239 | 47% |
| 1980 | 27 | 13 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 557 | 223 | 40% |
| 1981 | 19 | 12 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 497 | 284 | 57% |
| 1982 | 31 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 584 | 278 | 47% |
| 1983 | 29 | 14 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 634 | 272 | 42% |
| 1984 | 32 | 16 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 670 | 284 | 42% |
| 1985 | 36 | 22 | 11 | 9 | 3 | 908 | 440 | 48% |
| 1986 | 33 | 22 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 946 | 351 | 37% |
| 1987 | 42 | 28 | 9 | 11 | 9 | 1234 | 452 | 36% |
| 1988 | 27 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 727 | 326 | 44% |
| 1989 | 23 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 792 | 438 | 55% |
| 1990 | 36 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 760 | 321 | 42% |
| 1991 | 32 | 14 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 760 | 312 | 41% |
| 1992 | 30 | 15 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 840 | 410 | 48% |
| 1993 | 33 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 865 | 449 | 51% |
| 1994 | 30 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 860 | 392 | 45% |
| 1995 | 40 | 14 | 8 | 10 | 5 | 1000 | 434 | 43% |
| 1996 | 25 | 13 | 11 | 8 | 5 | 915 | 383 | 41% |
| 1997 | 20 | 8 | 11 | 9 | 5 | 870 | 579 | 66% |
| 1998 | 21 | 9 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 785 | 200 | 25% |
| 1999 | 22 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 5 | 860 | 279 | 32% |
| 2000 | 22 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 800 | 347 | 43% |
| 2001 | 19 | 16 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 845 | 258 | 30% |
| 2002 | 21 | 11 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 815 | 262 | 32% |
| 2003 | 17 | 9 | 6 | 11 | 5 | 825 | 324 | 39% |
| 2004 | 21 | 17 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 426 | 226 | 53% |
| 2005 | 24 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 5 | 474 | 185 | 39% |
| 2006 | 26 | 13 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 460 | 166 | 36% |
| 2007 | 34 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 477 | 206 | 43% |
| 2008 | 26 | 14 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 404 | 128 | 31% |
| 2009 | 25 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 4 | 452 | 210 | 46% |
| 2010 | 20 | 13 | 9 | 10 | 6 | 472 | 143 | 30% |
| 2011 | 14 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 9 | 317 | 108 | 34% |
| 2012 | 23 | 11 | 8 | 11 | 6 | 345 | 135 | 39% |
| 2013 | 20 | 16 | 13 | 8 | 7 | 372 | 147 | 39% |
| 2014 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 11 | 6 | 359 | 181 | 50% |
| 2015 | 20 | 12 | 12 | 6 | 7 | 339 | 119 | 35% |
| 2016 | 18 | 12 | 7 | 14 | 7 | 392 | 209 | 53% |
| 2017 | 16 | 14 | 5 | 11 | 7 | 319 | 169 | 52% |
| 2018 | 18 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 351 | 170 | 48% |
| 2019 | 14 | 18 | 11 | 11 | 3 | 275 | 86 | 31% |
| 2020 | 15 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 4 | 287 | 82 | 28% |
| 2021 | 23 | 9 | 7 | 11 | 4 | 266 | 107 | 40% |
| 2022 | 22 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 324 | 72 | 22% |
| 2023 | 17 | 23 | 9 | 12 | 4 | 308 | 106 | 34% |
Analysis
Below is a graph with the position of the winner of the mountains classification in the general classification.
Different than the points classification, this does not really show specialisation. The winner of the mountains classification is (almost always) in the top 30.
Exceptions:
- 1937: The mountains classification was won by Felicien Vervaecke, who did not start the 17th stage together with his team. At that moment, he was ranked 10th in the general classification.
- 1953: Jesus Loroño finished behind the leaders in flat stages, but excelled in the mountain stages. He ended in 50th place in the general classification.
- 1974: Domingo Perurena attacked early in the 11th and 16th stages, and this gave him enough points to win the mountains classification. In the general classification, he finished 44th.
- 2002: Laurent Jalabert scored many points in the 11th to 13th stages, but finished 42nd in the general classification.
- 2009: Franco Pellizotti.
- 2010: Anthony Charteau.
- 2014: Rafal Majka.
Sponsor
In 1968, the mountains classification received a visible sponsor: the leader received a patch to put on their jersey. In 1975, the polkadot jersey was introduced.
- 1968:
- Poulain
- 1972–1973:
- Poulain
- 1975–1978:
- Poulain
- 1979–1981:
- Campagnoli
- 1982–1984:
- Poulain
- 1985–1989:
- Cafe de Colombia
- 1990:
- Ripolin
- 1991–1992:
- Coca cola
- 1993–2008:
- Champion
- 2009–2010:
- Carrefour